Governor Tim Walz and JD Vance have drastically different records when it comes to addressing extreme weather and protecting Americans from its impacts. Walz has taken action both as governor and while serving in the House of Representatives to strengthen extreme weather response and homeowners’ insurance in the wake of natural disasters, mitigate extreme heat effects, fight wildfires, and combat flooding and storms. Meanwhile, JD Vance opposed legislation to protect communities from extreme weather and extend flood insurance, ignored extreme heat impacts, and even fundraised as communities were bracing for the impact of Hurricane Helene.

The Contrast: Hurricanes And Tropical Storms

Governor Walz has a track record of supporting communities impacted by hurricanes, vowing to continue reconstruction efforts from Hurricane Maria and deploying Minnesota resources to assist with recovery efforts. Vance, however, canceled public campaign events due to Hurricane Helene, but fundraised in areas expected to be impacted by the storm. Vance’s Project 2025 calls for the dismantling of the National Weather Service, which tracks hurricanes and storms, putting more lives at risk of extreme weather.

Walz Supported Communities Impacted By Hurricanes

While Vance Canceled Public Events And Attended A Fundraiser Ahead Of Hurricane Helene, His Project 2025 Agenda Would Dismantle The National Weather Service, Putting More Lives At Risk 

The Contrast: Sea Level Rise And Flooding

Governor Walz has a record of assisting Americans impacted by flooding – declaring peacetime emergencies to support emergency flood operations and signing an executive order to provide financial assistance to veterans during extreme flooding. Governor Walz also invested in combatting flooding impacts, including issuing $24 million in flood hazard mitigation grants and investing $100 million to upgrade infrastructure to be more resistant to flooding. While serving in the House, Walz voted in favor of the National Flood Insurance Program. In contrast, Vance repeatedly voted against legislation that would extend the National Flood Insurance Program, and while visiting North Carolina in the wake of historic and destructive flooding, Vance failed to acknowledge the flood’s impact.

As Governor, Walz Assisted Those Impacted By Flooding 

As Governor, Walz Invested To Combat Flooding Impacts 

In Congress, Walz Supported The National Flood Insurance Program

Vance Repeatedly Voted Against Legislation That Would Have Extended The National Flood Insurance Program

In A Visit To North Carolina In The Wake Of Historic Flooding, Vance Failed To Acknowledge The Floods Or Their Impact

The Contrast: Infrastructure Climate Resiliency And Preparedness

As a congressman and as governor, Walz has taken action to tackle extreme weather impacts, recognizing that extreme weather is worsened by climate change. As governor, Walz signed legislation to strengthen Minnesota’s disaster assistance response. In the House, Walz cosponsored legislation to address extreme weather impacts on wildlife and supported a bill that strengthened homeowners’ insurance, protecting Americans from financial hardship in the aftermath of extreme weather disasters. As a senator, Vance opposed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which invested nearly $1 billion to protect communities from extreme weather. Vance also claimed that Kamala Harris’ energy policies made Americans more vulnerable to extreme weather when, in fact, clean energy can increase grid resilience in the face of extreme weather. Vance has also blamed the Biden-Harris administration for increased homeowners’ insurance rates – which have seen increases largely due to climate change.  

Walz Has Acted To Tackle Extreme Weather Impacts Fuelled By Climate Change 

Vance Opposed The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Which Has Invested Nearly $1 Billion To Help Communities Protect Against Extreme Weather

Vance Bizarrely Claimed That Kamala Harris’ Energy Policies Would Make Americans More Vulnerable To Extreme Weather

Vance Criticized California’s Property Insurance Market And Blamed The Biden-Harris Administration For An Increase In Homeowners’ Insurance Rates

The Contrast: Extreme Heat And Drought

In the fight against extreme heat and drought, Governor Walz has invested $100 million to combat the heat island effect in Minnesota and announced a $10 million drought relief package to support farmers in the state. On the other hand, Vance was invested in and served on the board of a tech startup where workers were subject to grueling working conditions, being exposed to temperatures as high as 128 degrees. Vance also opposed the clean energy plan and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, both of which make historic investments in protecting Americans from extreme heat and drought.

Walz Worked To Mitigate The Impacts Of Extreme Heat And Drought

Vance Opposed The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law And Clean Energy Plan, Which Invested In Efforts To Combat Extreme Heat And Drought

Vance Served On The Board Of A Tech Startup Where Workers Alleged Grueling Work Conditions And Exposure To Extreme Heat

Vance Held Campaign Rallies In Extreme Temperatures, Endangering Rallygoers 

The Contrast: Wildfires

Throughout his time as governor, Walz has utilized Minnesota National Guard resources to fight wildfires in Minnesota, as well as in Louisiana, Canada, Washington, and Oregon. Meanwhile, Vance has praised Donald Trump’s actions on wildfires, which include threatening to withhold funding to fight wildfires and repeated attempts to slash wildfire science funding. 

Walz Supported Efforts To Combat Wildfires

Vance Praised Donald Trump’s Actions On Wildfires, Despite Trump’s Reckless Attempts To Withhold And Slash Funding To Fight Wildfires